-
Zach Osterman ●
- 5 stars Rating: 94
467 votes total - (12351)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
OldOaken said...
That's a tough call. However, I think you still have To go with Smart as the "shot" though. Watford was important because it proved to the nation that Indiana was a force again.
Zach Osterman // IU Athletics beat reporter // Follow me on Twitter at www.twitter.com/ZachOsterman
Zach Osterman ●
- 5 stars Rating: 94
467 votes total - (12351)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Zach Osterman said...
Yea, I think Sanburn's argument was generational too, speaking to people more my age, who haven't known Indiana to have many of those moments or find that national relevancy in our lifetime (I was less than two months old when Smart hit that shot, for reference).
Also:
!
OldOaken247 on twitter..... I say a lot of stuff you wont care about.
-
Chester_Fried said...
I was 18 months old when Smart's shot went through the net, but Watty's shot doesn't come close to Smart's. It's all about winning the Natty, and without that shot, we only have four banners.
Zach Osterman // IU Athletics beat reporter // Follow me on Twitter at www.twitter.com/ZachOsterman
Zach Osterman ●
- 5 stars Rating: 94
467 votes total - (12351)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Zach Osterman ●
- 5 stars Rating: 94
467 votes total - (12351)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars

Interesting take on Watford vs. Smart